Je doute que les appareils numériques aient cette durée de vie. Et de toute façon, ça se révise pas... A la poubelle...

Ouais, et en plus ils sont obsoletes 1 mois apres l'achat.

A part le look et bien sur les dos interchangeables, quelles différences y a-t-il entre le Kiev60 et le 88 ?

Is the Kiev 60 more reliable than the Kiev 88?
Many people will tell you that the Kiev 60 is a more reliable camera than the Kiev 88. It has mainly to do with the Kiev 60's lack of interchangeable film backs. This makes for a simpler camera which is less prone to problems.

That is not to say that ALL Kiev 60's are less problematic than ALL Kiev 88's. With either camera model, you can end up with a lemon.

Is the Kiev 88 less reliable than the Kiev 60?
The general concensus on this seems to be that, yes, the Kiev 88 is more prone to problems than the Kiev 60. The more complex gearing of the Kiev 88 which is needed to give the interchangeable film magazine design, requires a greater degree of precision to be implemented correctly. Precision is something that the factory which makes Kiev cameras seems to be lacking at times.

The Kiev 60 uses a simpler design, giving up the interchangeable film backs. Simpler design means easier to manufacture and in theory, less prone to breaking down.

That said, some Kiev 88's have been known to go for many many years giving problem-free service. Some Kiev 60's are dead on delivery. I don't think it is fair to say that ALL Kiev 60's are more reliable than ALL Kiev 88's. With either camera, it can still very much be luck of the draw.

Pour les non anglophones je fais un résumé :
Les kiev c'est quand même des tacots alors moins ils sont compliqués mieux c'est. On vous aura prévenu